I was particularly interested

Abairhasan15

In the writers’ feedback regarding their satisfaction with the overall quality of our new briefs compared to the old ones. It was important for me to gather their responses and compare the two. When queried about their satisfaction with the new briefs on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being “extremely dissatisfied” and 5 being “extremely satisfied,” 80% of the writers voted 4 or 5. None of them voted 1 or 2. However, the feedback for the old briefs was different. Only 10% voted 5, while 80% voted 3 and 4, and 10% voted 2 (dissatisfied). Open-ended questions.


Additionally, I gathered insights by posing open-ended questions regarding the writers’ preferences and critiques regarding both the new/updated and old briefs. Here are a few excerpts from their feedback: “[…] I’d say the more recent the briefs, the better Lists Of Mobile Number List more clearer they’ve been. I wasn’t dissatisfied with the old briefs, but I really like the amount of detail included in the new ones.” “This content brief provided just enough information on what needed to be included, while still allowing for the writer to use [their] own creativity. Briefs that include too.




Much micro-management in what is to be written are stagnating, at least to this writer, so this one had just the right mix.” (Referring to an updated brief) “Generally, the less information/direction, the less I liked the brief. I just really like knowing that the client and I are on exactly the same page.” “I can’t remember individual ones, but I remember not even picking up some articles because the language on the brief just wasn’t clear enough to tell me what was needed.” (Referring to old briefs) “I have written articles for clients who simply gave me a single word to go on […] and others who provide full outlines.